There are risks in every organization, some large and some small. For decades, most Process Safety Management-based companies have focused on lagging indicators to assess risks. But as the old cliché says, “You don’t know what you don’t know.” And having too many tools that cause hazardous scenarios to be generated in a formulaic, cookie-cutter manner can result in resources being focused in the wrong areas.

Aligning policies, procedures and objectives while at the same time supporting continuous improvement initiatives is a challenging endeavor. However, industry is moving toward improved approaches guided by metrics and detailed analysis of systems to identify which are most in need of improvement.

Download E-book.

Circles-1 (1)
EB 008 – Future-Proofing Process Hazard Analysis copy

Latest insights from Sphera

When a Topic is Material, Not Everything is: Datapoint-Level Materiality Explained

When a Topic is Material, Not Everything is: Datapoint-Level Materiality Explained

Material topic ≠ report everything. Learn how to apply datapoint-level materiality under ESRS to prioritize decision-useful data and…
April 29, 2026
Why supplier scores are no longer enough

Why supplier scores are no longer enough

Beyond EcoVadis: Why supplier scores aren't enough for 2026 resilience. Move from static ratings to real-time N-tier visibility…
April 27, 2026
Five Ways to Keep Data Optimized for AI

Five Ways to Keep Data Optimized for AI

Master supply chain risk management with Sphera. Move from fragmented data to AI-driven intelligence for proactive ESG compliance…
April 24, 2026